Another update by omeritzics · Pull Request #150 · omeritzics/Updatium

omeritzics · 2026-02-15T22:29:41Z

PR Type

Enhancement

Description

Add fallback PR creation when auto-commit fails
Apply changes across CI, nightly, and release workflows
Enable graceful handling of permission-restricted branches
Assign step IDs and error continuation for commit actions

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Auto-fix linting"] --> B["Commit and Push"]
  B --> C{Commit outcome}
  C -->|Success| D["Workflow continues"]
  C -->|Failure| E["Create Pull Request"]
  E --> F["Auto-fix PR created"]

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

ci.yml `Add PR fallback for CI workflow commit failures` .github/workflows/ci.yml Add `id: commit` to the auto-commit step for outcome tracking Add `continue-on-error: true` to allow workflow continuation on commit failure Add new step to create PR when commit fails using `peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6` Configure PR with auto-fix branch name and auto-deletion on merge	+13/-0
nightly.yml `Add PR fallback for nightly workflow commit failures` .github/workflows/nightly.yml Add `id: commit` to the auto-commit step for outcome tracking Add `continue-on-error: true` to allow workflow continuation on commit failure Add new step to create PR when commit fails using `peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6` Configure PR with nightly-specific branch name and auto-deletion on merge	+13/-0
release.yml `Add PR fallback for release workflow commit failures` .github/workflows/release.yml Add `id: commit` to the auto-commit step for outcome tracking Add `continue-on-error: true` to allow workflow continuation on commit failure Add new step to create PR when commit fails using `peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6` Configure PR with release-specific branch name and auto-deletion on merge	+13/-0

gemini-code-assist · 2026-02-15T22:29:46Z

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

github-actions · 2026-02-15T22:29:54Z

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package

Version

Score

Details

actions/peter-evans/create-pull-request

6.*.*

🟢 5.1

Details

Check	Score	Reason
Code-Review	🟢 3	Found 4/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Maintained	🟢 10	17 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Binary-Artifacts	🟢 10	no binaries found in the repo
Dangerous-Workflow	🟢 10	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices	⚠️ 0	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Packaging	⚠️ -1	packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions	⚠️ 0	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License	🟢 10	license file detected
Pinned-Dependencies	⚠️ 1	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Fuzzing	⚠️ 0	project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases	⚠️ -1	no releases found
Branch-Protection	⚠️ -1	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Security-Policy	⚠️ 0	security policy file not detected
SAST	⚠️ 0	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities	🟢 9	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Files

.github/workflows/release.yml

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-15T22:30:30Z

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
⚪	Workflow token permissions Description: The workflow adds an automated PR-creation path using `peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6` with `${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}`; if these workflows can be triggered in a context that includes untrusted code (e.g., `pull_request` events or other attacker-influenced inputs), this can enable unintended branch/PR creation or repository writes unless `permissions:` are explicitly minimized and the step is restricted (similar new usage also appears in `.github/workflows/nightly.yml` and `.github/workflows/release.yml`). ci.yml [58-67] Referred Code - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
🔴	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Invalid YAML indentation: The newly added `Create Pull Request if push failed` step appears mis-indented relative to the other steps, which can break the workflow and prevent the intended fallback behavior from running. Referred Code - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
⚪	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Workflow permissions unclear: The new `peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6` step uses `${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}` and may require explicit workflow `permissions` (e.g., `contents: write`, `pull-requests: write`) not shown in the diff, so authorization behavior cannot be verified from the provided changes alone. Referred Code - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by release workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-release-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
Update

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-15T22:31:43Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to c255754

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Incremental ^[*]	Use correct PR base branch Set the `base` for the new pull request to `github.event.pull_request.base.ref` for `pull_request` events, with a fallback to `github.ref_name` for other events. .github/workflows/ci.yml [63] -base: ${{ github.ref_name }} +base: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref \|\| github.ref_name }} Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a critical bug where an incorrect `base` branch is used for PR creation during `pull_request` events and provides a precise fix using `github.event.pull_request.base.ref`, making the workflow behave as intended.	High
Incremental ^[*]	Gate PR creation by event type Modify the `if` condition to prevent the pull request creation step from running on `pull_request` events. Also, add `always()` for clarity when checking a failed step's outcome. .github/workflows/ci.yml [59] -if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' +if: always() && github.event_name != 'pull_request' && steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that running this step on `pull_request` events is problematic due to `github.ref_name` pointing to a synthetic ref, and provides a valid condition to prevent this, which fixes a potential workflow failure.	Medium
Possible issue	Ensure PR targets valid base Add an explicit `base` branch to the `create-pull-request` step in the release workflow. This prevents potential failures when the workflow is triggered by a tag, by falling back to the repository's default branch. .github/workflows/release.yml [48-57] - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + base: ${{ github.ref_type == 'branch' && github.ref_name \|\| github.event.repository.default_branch }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by release workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-release-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion correctly points out that not specifying a `base` branch in a release workflow (often triggered by tags) can lead to errors, and proposes a robust solution to dynamically set the base to the default branch, preventing potential workflow failures.	Medium
Possible issue	Remove duplicated branch configuration Remove the duplicate `branch` key in the `create-pull-request` step to ensure the correct, more specific branch name is used. .github/workflows/ci.yml [58-68] - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} base: ${{ github.ref_name }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" branch: ${{ github.ref_name }}-auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} - branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a duplicated `branch` key in the YAML configuration, which would cause the first, more specific branch name to be silently ignored, fixing a functional bug.	Medium
General	Set a deterministic PR base Add an explicit `base` branch to the `create-pull-request` step in the nightly workflow. This prevents potential failures by dynamically setting the base to the current branch if it exists, or falling back to the repository's default branch. .github/workflows/nightly.yml [62-71] - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + base: ${{ github.ref_type == 'branch' && github.ref_name \|\| github.event.repository.default_branch }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by nightly workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-nightly-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion correctly points out that not specifying a `base` branch can lead to errors if the workflow runs on a non-branch ref, and proposes a robust solution to dynamically set the base to the default branch, preventing potential workflow failures.	Medium
Update

Previous suggestions

✅ Suggestions up to commit 34b907b

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	✅ ~~Fix broken pull request creation logic~~ Suggestion Impact: The PR-creation condition was adjusted to additionally require that changes were detected, refining when create-pull-request runs in the failure path. code diff: - name: Create Pull Request if push failed - if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' + if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 Fix the workflow logic for creating a pull request. The `create-pull-request` action will not find any changes to commit because the preceding `git-auto-commit-action` step has already committed them. .github/workflows/ci.yml [50-67] - name: Commit and Push changes id: commit - uses: stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@v5 - with: - commit_message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" - branch: ${{ github.ref_name }} + run: \| + git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" + git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com" + git add . + if git diff --staged --quiet; then + echo "No changes to commit" + exit 0 + fi + git commit -m "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" + git push continue-on-error: true - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a critical flaw in the workflow logic where `create-pull-request` would fail because changes are already committed by the previous step, preventing the fallback PR from being created. Although the proposed code doesn't fully resolve the issue, identifying this fundamental bug is highly valuable.	High
Possible issue	✅ ~~Skip PR when no fixes~~ Suggestion Impact: Updated the PR creation step's if condition to include steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true', preventing empty pull requests. code diff: - name: Create Pull Request if push failed - if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' + if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' Add a condition to the 'Create Pull Request' step to check if the `commit` step detected any changes. Use `steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true'` to avoid creating empty pull requests. .github/workflows/ci.yml [58-67] - name: Create Pull Request if push failed - if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' + if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: This is a good suggestion to prevent empty pull requests. It correctly uses the `changes_detected` output from the `stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action` to conditionally run the PR creation step, improving the workflow's robustness.	Medium
High-level	Use reusable workflows to avoid duplication The PR adds duplicated logic for handling auto-commit failures to three separate workflow files. This logic should be extracted into a reusable workflow or composite action to centralize it and improve maintainability. Examples: .github/workflows/ci.yml [47-67] - name: Auto-fix linting issues run: dart fix --apply - name: Commit and Push changes id: commit uses: stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@v5 with: commit_message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" branch: ${{ github.ref_name }} continue-on-error: true ... (clipped 11 lines) .github/workflows/nightly.yml [51-71] - name: Auto-fix linting issues run: dart fix --apply - name: Commit and Push changes id: commit uses: stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@v5 with: commit_message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" branch: ${{ github.ref_name }} continue-on-error: true ... (clipped 11 lines) Solution Walkthrough: Before: # In .github/workflows/ci.yml ... - name: Auto-fix linting issues run: dart fix --apply - name: Commit and Push changes id: commit uses: stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@v5 with: branch: ${{ github.ref_name }} continue-on-error: true - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" # ... similar logic repeated in nightly.yml and release.yml After: # In .github/workflows/ci.yml (caller) ... - name: Auto-fix and Create PR on Failure uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-autofix.yml with: workflow_type: 'ci' github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # In ./.github/workflows/reusable-autofix.yml (new reusable workflow) on: workflow_call: inputs: workflow_type: type: string required: true jobs: autofix: steps: - name: Auto-fix linting issues run: dart fix --apply - name: Commit and Push changes id: commit ... continue-on-error: true - name: Create Pull Request if push failed if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: branch: "auto-fix-lint-${{ inputs.workflow_type }}-${{ github.run_number }}" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by ${{ inputs.workflow_type }} workflow" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies significant code duplication across three workflow files, and proposing a reusable workflow is a best practice that would greatly improve the long-term maintainability of the CI configuration.	Medium
General	✅ ~~Explicitly set PR base~~ Suggestion Impact: Added `base: ${{ github.ref_name }}` to the create-pull-request action configuration to explicitly set the PR base branch. code diff: + if: steps.commit.outcome == 'failure' && steps.commit.outputs.changes_detected == 'true' uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6 with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + base: ${{ github.ref_name }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" Explicitly set the base branch for the created pull request by adding `base: ${{` `github.ref_name }}` to the `with` block of the `create-pull-request` action. .github/workflows/ci.yml [61-67] with: token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + base: ${{ github.ref_name }} commit-message: "style: auto-fix linting and formatting issues" title: "Auto-fix linting and formatting issues" body: "Automated lint fixes applied by CI workflow" branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} delete-branch: true `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 __ Why: This suggestion improves the workflow's clarity and robustness by explicitly setting the `base` branch for the pull request. While the action might default to the correct branch, being explicit prevents potential issues.	Low
General	✅ ~~Use unique branch names~~ Suggestion Impact: The workflow was changed to use a branch name that prepends `${{ github.ref_name }}` to the auto-fix branch name (though the old `auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }}` branch line still remains as well). code diff: + branch: ${{ github.ref_name }}-auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} Make the auto-fix branch name more descriptive by prepending the source branch name. Change the `branch` parameter to `branch: ${{ github.ref_name` `}}-auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }}`. .github/workflows/ci.yml [66] -branch: auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} +branch: ${{ github.ref_name }}-auto-fix-lint-${{ github.run_number }} `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 __ Why: This suggestion improves branch naming for better traceability by including the source branch name. While `github.run_number` likely ensures uniqueness, adding the ref name makes it easier to identify the origin of the auto-fix branch.	Low

.github/workflows/ci.yml

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

.github/workflows/ci.yml

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

.github/workflows/ci.yml

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Another update

34b907b

qodo-code-review bot added the Review effort 2/5 label Feb 15, 2026

qodo-code-review bot reviewed Feb 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

.github/workflows/ci.yml Show resolved Hide resolved

Update .github/workflows/ci.yml

129b1f8

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

qodo-code-review bot reviewed Feb 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

.github/workflows/ci.yml Show resolved Hide resolved

Update .github/workflows/ci.yml

2851b97

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

qodo-code-review bot reviewed Feb 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

omeritzics and others added 3 commits February 16, 2026 00:50

Update .github/workflows/ci.yml

c255754

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Update ci.yml

5394e7b

Update ci.yml

8faa719

omeritzics merged commit b32c30f into main Feb 15, 2026
2 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Another update#150

Another update#150
omeritzics merged 6 commits intomainfrom
fix-gradle-filter-type

omeritzics commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited by qodo-code-review bot

Loading

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 15, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Examples:

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

After:

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

omeritzics commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited by qodo-code-review bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Type

Description

Diagram Walkthrough

File Walkthrough

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 15, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Dependency Review

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scanned Files

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Previous suggestions

Examples:

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

After:

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

omeritzics commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited by qodo-code-review bot

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading